On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:31:34 AM, DNI Department wrote: > We have rbldnsd running of a private IP with BIND/DNS forwarding calls to > the various SURBL lists to that name server. We are approved to rsync the > data from surbl; and that's been working well.
> Our primary mail server is on a physical server running several network > applications besides mail; we will be moving it to its own physical server > in a few months; hopefully then we can match your under 2 second benchmark. Sounds good. :-) > On a side note, we are a paid spamcop.net subscriber; and we do report all > spam to spamcop (under 8 hour average reporting time); so we do what we can > to prevent spam in the first place. Definitely use SpamCop. SpamCop reports go into their RBL, and the spamvertised sites detected in spam message body URIs go into sc.surbl.org, where they're highly effective at detecting future pam. I would definitely encourage everyone to use SpamCop. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/