I'd take that bet. While you are almost certainly correct with the likes of those who subscribe to this group, who often have multiple email addresses, out there in [EMAIL PROTECTED] land, and hotmail world, most people have a single email address strongly related to their name.
Back to the original question: Regardless of whether anyone thinks it is a good test or not, has anyone yet created such a test? > Mike Spamassassin wrote: > >>Point taken, but I still think it would be a valid test. >>Like all SpamAssassin tests it should only be one of many indicators. >> > > No, not really. There's a minimum useful S/O ratio for spam rules. > > I'd bet $5.00 that this rule would have a S/O under 0.80 in the > corpus.(ie: no more 80% of it's hits were spam, and at least 20% were ham) > >
