On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 12:29:41 PM, List User wrote: (Jeff C wrote:) >>uridnsbl used in the default rule URIBL_SBL does check domain >>name servers against SBL, but I'm kind of surprised to hear it >>triggering on email addresses. It should definitely be >>checking web >>sites and the like. Can you give a sample of the text it hit? >>Was it in URI form like: >> >> mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>That said, I agree that the SBL listings are at times overbroad.
(Paul wrote:) > Spamhaus does sometimes "escalate" against companies that ignore > issues for a long time; But this isn't one of those cases. Here the listing > is: > http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL17240 > which covers exactly one IP 154.33.17.212/32 and gives a good reason for it. I should have checked further. A /32 does not seem like an escalation to me either. The more important issue for SpamAssassin is that mail addresses in message bodies should not be checked by uridnsbl. Only URIs should be checked. Bobby, Please create a bugzilla for this as Justin suggests. Be sure to include in the ticket the text that it triggered on. http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
