On Sat, 13 Jan 2018, Alex wrote:
From: "F*e dE x" <fedexdispatchl...@speedpost.com>That address hardly resembles "Fed Ex", but how general of a rule can we create and still catch variations such as this? I thought something like this would work: header FUZZY_FEDEX From =~ /(?!f.?e.?d.{0,3}e.?x)<F>.?<E>.?<D>.{0,3}<E>.?<X>/i
To fully debug this, I think we need to know the replace_tag definitions you've set for these characters. That said, the first thing I notice is that the negative lookahead pattern matches your
From header (twice, I think). This means that no matter what follows,
this rule will not trigger. I suspect you want the negative lookahead to be more strictly correct, like "(?!fed ex)". You may also want to use "From:name =~" to limit the search to the non-address portion of the header. -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | System Admin - UT CompSci =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | sha...@shanew.net Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.ischool.utexas.edu/~shanew
