Just a hunch, but did you make sure to add the "$self->register..."
line inside the "sub new {" block with all the others in HeaderEval.pm?


On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Chris wrote:

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:05 -0500, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
This is my current solution for a problem that has been discussed
many times in this list. 
I wrote it last year, and it serves me well. Feel free to use it, if
you find it useful. 

This part goes into your local.cf:

header   __F_DM1 eval:from_domains_mismatch()
header   __F_DM2 From:addr =~
/\@(pec|legalmail|telecompost)(\.[^\.]+)?\.it/
meta       F_DM ( __F_DM1 && ! __F_DM2 )
describe   F_DM From:name domain mismatches From:addr domain
priority   F_DM -1
score      F_DM 5.0

This part goes into the general HeaderEval.pm:

$self->register_eval_rule("from_domains_mismatch");
[...]
sub from_domains_mismatch {
  my ($self, $pms) = @_;
  my $temp;
  $temp = $pms->get('From:addr');
  $temp =~ /@(.+)/; my $fromAddrDomain; $fromAddrDomain = "$1";
  $temp = $pms->get('From:name');
  $temp =~ /@([^\@\"\s]+)/; my $fromNameDomain; $fromNameDomain =
"$1";
  dbg("from_domains_mismatch: fromNameDomain=$fromNameDomain,
fromAddrDomain=$fromAddrDomain");
  if ( $fromNameDomain eq "" ) {
     return 0; # all well
  } else {
     if( $fromNameDomain eq $fromAddrDomain ) {
        return 0; # all well, they match
     } else {
        return 1; # mismatch, possibly spam
     }
  }
}

R.G.

Just for the heck of it I added the above to my SpamAssassin setup at
home. However my syslog shows:

rules: failed to run __F_DM1 test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "from_domains_mismatch" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1816) line 19.)

I did restart SA after adding this. SA version 3.4.1



--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at            |                 Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/                |      System Admin - UT CompSci
=----------------------------------+-------------------------------
All syllogisms contain three lines |              sha...@shanew.net
Therefore this is not a syllogism  | www.ischool.utexas.edu/~shanew

Reply via email to