On 2/22/2018 4:15 AM, saqariden wrote:
i'm using mimedefang with spamassasin, when I test an email with the command "spamassain -t file.eml", I got results like this:

Dails de l'analyse du message:   (-5.8 points, 3.0 requis)
-5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI       RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high
                            [ listed in list.dnswl.org]

-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: L'algorithme Bayien a alula probabilitde spam
                            entre 0 et 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 0.3 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL  To domain == From domain and external SPF

However, the SA check which was done trough mimedefang, seems like giving other scores, how can i test an email to get these scores, and saw the difference.

Network tests and Bayesian tests could change in between runs.

Unless you ran the tests almost concurrently, this could be normal/expected behavior.

I love MD and I don't run it with spamassassin it's space.  I use a system call to spamc and interpret the results.  That way I'm always using the same configuration for spamassassin and I can spam it onto other servers easily.


Reply via email to