On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Noel Butler wrote:

On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:

-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS      RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
[ listed in iadb.isipp.com]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF       RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN     RBL: IADB: All mailing list mail is opt-in
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID  RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED    RBL: Participates in the IADB system
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_DK        RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Domain Keys record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED   RBL: ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for sender

I am concerned when the default settings in SA effectively facilitate marketing companies to stuff my Inbox full of junk.

-0.6 points makes the difference?

Perhaps the default scores need to be reviewed, but simply having the
rules isn't problematic.

Have to agree with him, it can make all the difference in some cases,
I'd prefer to see the rules stay, but all at score 0

-0.001 surely... 0 = disabled = breaks dependencies.

 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
  How can you reason with someone who thinks we're on a glidepath to
  a police state and yet their solution is to grant the government a
  monopoly on force? They are insane.
 11 days until Albert Einstein's 139th Birthday

Reply via email to