On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
> > In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is > > just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes > > scores. > > What I generally look at is the detailed rule performance in > masscheck. If it primarily hits on spams that score in total 1-3 > points. Why not under 5?