On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:

> > In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
> > just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes
> > scores.  
> 
> What I generally look at is the detailed rule performance in
> masscheck. If it primarily hits on spams that score in total 1-3
> points.

Why not under 5?

Reply via email to