On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300
Robert Boyl wrote:
Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor?

razor is great at spam detection.

It says on their site " Detection is done with statistical and
randomized signatures that efficiently spot mutating spam content. "

For example those scores were for a totally legit email that had some
screenshots embedded in the email...

some screenshots? afaik razor only work on text parts, so short mail is
quite possible to be detected (as some people report image-only spam)

Also, how to report FP?

razor-revoke -d -dl=2 -f false-positives

where "false-positives" is a mbox file format.

On 09.03.18 09:26, David Jones wrote:
RAZOR like DCC and PYZOR shouldn't be used as a sole source of determining spam.

especially DCC, since it measures bulkiness, not spamminess.

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease

Reply via email to