On 04/10/2018 03:49 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
I apologize here is the email headers and body


On 10.04.18 16:28, David Jones wrote:
Content analysis details:   (16.0 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
4.2 RCVD_IN_IVMBL_LASTEXTERNAL RBL: No description available.
                           [ listed in sip.invaluement.com]
5.2 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                           [score: 0.9996]
3.2 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                           [score: 0.9996]
1.2 ENA_RELAY_IN           Relayed through India
0.0 MISSING_MIME_HB_SEP BODY: Missing blank line between MIME header and
2.2 ENA_RELAY_NOT_US Relayed from outside the US and not on whitelists
0.0 ENA_BAD_SPAM           Spam hitting really bad rules.

Since most ofthose rules are 3rd party and other have tuned scores, it's
quite expected that the mail scored 3.5.

(BAYES_999 was apparently not hit, it would score 3.7 then).

we sometimes must accept that a FP appears.
otherwise, there would be no spam and no discussion here :-)

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"One World. One Web. One Program." - Microsoft promotional advertisement
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!" - Adolf Hitler

Reply via email to