On 08/08/2018 15:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...of last 40 mail in my spambox, 14 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI
...of last 100 mail in spambox, 27 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI
On 09.08.18 08:54, Daniele Duca wrote:
I practically zeroed MAILING_LIST_MULTI the day it came in the ruleset.
I mean, since there's tflag "noautolearn" designed for this, the flag
"learn" should not be ignored.
It's easy to put:
tflags BAYES_99 learn noautolearn
but not possible to put:
tflags BAYES_99 learn dothefuckingautolearn
Wouldn't
tflags BAYES_99 autolearn_force
do what you want? Or did I misunderstood completely what you meant?
Personally I'll never trust BAYES_* with autolearn_force. I saw some
FPs sometimes and I fear that autolearning would quickly lead to
poisoning
with autolearn_force yes, it could apparently lead to poisoning.
However, if "learn" only did its job (whatever it is) and only "noautolearn"
would ignore the score, it would be just enough.
Currently, as docs say, "learn" in fact implicates "noautolearn".
I just don't understand why. Simply use both flags and that's it.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
