On Monday, September 3, 2018, 6:52:25 PM GMT+2, Antony Stone <antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote: >It still sounds like a strange way of identifying spam to me: >1. surely there are far stronger indicators in the Received headers and/or the >body itself >2. people are going to be using glyphs such as this more and more commonly in >non-spam emails >There may be an argument for "every little helps", but that sounds like something better left to Bayes to me.
Basically i agree with you Antony but as you stated, "every little detail" counts... so why not to have a brain storming to dig out emojis detection... ----PedroD
