Rather than messing with a (nonexistent) plugin, I use a LearnAsSpam folder. This works on every Exchange server with IMAP enabled.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall#head-bea6b8dc4 f219edd3b9976e8f922a8f1c0603125 Or http://tinyurl.com/5xhfa If you want to get fancier, you could do a LearnAsHam folder that then moved the message back to the Inbox after learning, but I haven't found it necessary. More details at: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RemoteImapFolder - dan -- Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600> -----Original Message----- From: Gustafson, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 09:38 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Without Bayes > I can't comment on the effectiveness of SA without Bayes, but I can > suggest a couple of things. First, try just lowering the scores given > to Bayes a bit so that emails won't be marked as spam solely because of > Bayes. Secondly, try using per-user Bayes instead of global. It is > a little more work, but if you are serving email for a varied group of > email accounts, it will be much more effective. The problem with per-user Bayes for me is that I am running SpamAssassin with spamass-milter, and my users are not savvy enough to be able to update their own Bayes databases. They don't use any shell accounts - it's all POP3 and in some cases, after the e-mail passes through my SA it gets forwarded to their Exchange server. What would be awesome is if someone would write a plugin for Outlook (which 99% of my clients use) that would "post" the content of an e-mail to a web form with either a "SPAM" or "HAM" indicator so that I could write a PHP script that would add the message to the "SPAM" or "HAM" database, as needed. Tim
