On 12/11/19 6:21 AM, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Hi PFA...

On 12/11/2019 12:36 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 12/10/19 7:49 PM, Michael Storz wrote:
[...]
My copy hit

BODY_SINGLE_WORD=1.347, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=1.172, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79

not enough to mark it as spammy.

On 11 Dec 2019, at 2:39, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
FuzzyOcr + bayes is killing this kind of emails for me:

On 12/11/19 3:17 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
FuzzyOcr is unmaintained and doesn't even have an authoritative repository as far as I can tell. It is computationally very expensive, to the degree that it isn't safe to just add it to an existing mail system which does not have a lot of idle CPU and memory capacity.

On 2019-12-11 1:58 pm, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
it's true that it's unmaintained but I have it running on Perl 5.28
with some patches and it's still useful every now and then (if you
have some spare cpu cycles and you know what you are doing).
A new ocr plugin could be definetely a better choice.

On 13.12.19 09:21, Dean Carpenter wrote:
fuzzyocr is available from the standard repos for Ubuntu 18.04.  It's
v3.6.0-10, with a homepage listed as

https://web.archive.org/web/20130117050640/http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/

Interestingly I just got one of those bitcoin spams, but fuzzyocr didn't pick up on it. This is the spam report for it :

fuzzyocr only picks up some words and scores on them.

since OCR wasn't reliable much when it was developed, it didn't things like
pushing text back to SA for scanning with other rules.

I believe this could be done now.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
2B|!2B, that's a question!

Reply via email to