Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> writes: > Am 28.03.20 um 08:09 schrieb Cecil Westerhof: >> When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following: >> 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL >> blocklist >> [URIs: techwrestle.com] >> 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL >> blocklist >> [URIs: techwrestle.com] >> >> Should not one of those two be removed, because it is now penalised >> two times. >> It was spam, so that is not the problem, it only looks wrong to me. > > there is nothing wrong > that's the whole point of scoring > different sources > > or would you remove every RBL when stuff hits more then one instead say > "hey, when it's listed on 10 of it it's for *sure* spam"
Personally I would say: keep the highest one. In the above case 2.5. But that is only my 2 cents. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
