Stop biting my nose.
I’m not forcing anything, I just suggested you take your nonsense off-list
somewhere.
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 7:47 PM, jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> 1) You would not know fascism if it jumped up and bit your nose off.
> 2) You try to force your nonsense on me and I'll force my nonsense on you.
> Square?
>
> {^_^}
>
> On 20200710 15:26:49, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> What makes you think anyone on the list wants to hear your complaints and
>> your snide crypto-fascism?
>> Take it private or open an issue in the bug tracker.
>>> On Jul 10, 2020, at 6:01 PM, jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> And every ancillary script sysadmins have written has to be rewritten.
>>> Every user_prefs has to be rewritten. You are forcing a boatload of hurt on
>>> innocent people. This is purely lifting a leg and peeing on something to
>>> mark it as YOURS. Isn't that rather selfish?
>>> {^_^}
>>>
>>> On 20200710 13:27:45, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>> A common question we are receiving is what about using this terminology
>>>> instead, for example allow/deny.
>>>> The use of welcomelist and blocklist has evolved from discussions since
>>>> April and work done creating patches. We found that using these names
>>>> of welcomelist and blocklist are non offensive, reasonably descriptive
>>>> and since they still start with W and B, we avoid renaming things like
>>>> RBLs, WLBL, DNSBL, etc. This should help minimize the disruption when
>>>> 4.0 is released with the new configuration options.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> KAM
