I don't believe that use-case has been considered before. What does the rule you are using look like and I will double check?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020, 05:56 Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gang > > I am part of the SWINOG Anti-Spam Blacklists team which are used by a > handfull of swiss ISP. > > Very early, we also started adding IPv6 addresses to the blacklist but > soon noticed that there is a potential problem with IPv6 and wildcard > entries. > > Let's assume 2.0.0.0/24 is full of abusers and you decide to throw their > whole /24 in the Blacklist: > > *.0.0.2.dnsbl.example.org 300 in TXT "Bunch of abusers, /24 listed" > > This would wrongfully block an awful lot of IPv6 addresses! > > To avoid this issue, we use two different dns zones: > > *.0.0.2.dnsbl.example.org 300 in TXT "Bunch of abusers, /24 listed" > > *.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.dnsbl.example.org in TXT > "Spamer /64 listed" > > Well, but now I need to tell SpamAssassin to only query IPv4 addresses > on the first zone and only query IPv6 addresses on the ip6 one. > > I was not able to find a way to achieve this. Did I overlook something? > > Mit freundlichen Grüssen > > -Benoît Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ >
