RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> writes: > On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 12:03:52 -0400 > Greg Troxel wrote: > > >> You can and probably should report spam to dnswl. In theory HI should >> have essentially no spam. > > I thought that because I've never received a single spam with it, but in > mass checks it's at 0.23% of spam.
Do you mean that of all the spam in in-use corporaa, 0.23% of those spam messages trigger DNSWL_HI? I found some old discussion and it seems there is often trouble with a machine that receives and forwards mail, sort of j...@example.org getting sent to john....@other.com, as a legit thing, but if other.com doesn't put the example.org MTA in trusted_networks, it gets complicated. Although, HI is more or less supposed to be for things that do not have user-controlled mail, for non-controlled users. I did a quick scan over my own mail, and found 5 DNSWL_HI and none in spam folders. (This omits any that were MTA-rejected.) I realize that's an anecdote, not data.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
