If you have spamples for sharepoint phishes that evade kam ruleset, shoot
me an email off-list to discuss getting me the spamples.

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 16:43 Steve Dondley <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2021-04-11 04:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:
> >
> >> Content analysis details:   (4.4 points, 5.0 required)
> >>
> >>  pts rule name              description
> >> ---- ----------------------
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >>  3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> >>                             [score: 1.0000]
> >>  0.5 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to
> >> 100%
> >>                             [score: 1.0000]
> >> -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
> >>                             [52.100.189.222 listed in
> >> wl.mailspike.net]
> >> -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at
> >> https://www.dnswl.org/,
> >>                              no trust
> >>                             [52.100.189.222 listed in list.dnswl.org]
> >> -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
> >> -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
> >>  0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
> >>  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> >>  0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME
> >> parts
> >> -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
> >> signature
> >>  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
> >> necessarily
> >>                             valid
> >> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
> >> from
> >>                             author's domain
> >> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
> >> from
> >>                             envelope-from domain
> >>  0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75        message body is 50-75% uppercase
> >
> > i see its as a local problem
> >
> > http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/52.100.189.222.html
> >
> > do you use KAM.cf channel ?
>
> OK, I added KAM.cf to my config. It has now pushed it over 5.0, barely:
>
> Content analysis details:   (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
>
>   pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at
> https://www.dnswl.org/,
>                               no trust
>                              [52.100.189.222 listed in list.dnswl.org]
>   3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
>                              [score: 1.0000]
>   0.5 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
>                              [score: 1.0000]
> -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
>                              [52.100.189.222 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
> -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
>   0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
> -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
>   0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
>   0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
> signature
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
> from
>                              envelope-from domain
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
> from
>                              author's domain
>   0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
> necessarily
>                              valid
>   0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75        message body is 50-75% uppercase
>   0.2 KAM_MANYTO             Email has more than one To Header or more
> than 25
>                              recipients
>   0.5 KAM_NUMSUBJECT         Subject ends in numbers excluding current
> years
>   0.0 KAM_SHORT              Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
>

Reply via email to