But, it had:
* 2.5 CONTENT_AFTER_HTML More content after HTML close tag
but one was only text/plain and I could see nothing wrong. reading
72_active.cf I found:
rawbody __CONTENT_AFTER_HTML /<\/htnl>\s*[a-z0-9]/i
>
which fires on a text/plain part that discusses html formatting!
Note you show __CONTENT_AFTER_HTML and CONTENT_AFTER_HTML, which are not the
same rule. I suspect the meta for CONTENT_AFTER_HTML contains some other
things that should in theory make it not hit in this case.
I've personally never seen this rule hit, and didn't know it existed. Are
you sure it isn't a local rule? I have a rule of my own that gives 1 point
for extra trash after the /html end tag. I see it frequently on spam and UCE
that has a tracking tag in the HTML section after the official end of the
html.
Loren
