>On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 1:09 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk
>wrote:
>> have there been rejects often before?
On 24.05.22 13:58, Alex wrote:
>I have hundreds of these over the last few days (week?), but they could go
>back even further than that. It appears to primarily hit mailing lists or
>statements from providers like AmEx or notices from Delta, for example.
>> can you re-run spamassassin over those messages to see if uninstalling
>> that package fixed the error with the same e-mails?
>Yes, without that library, there's no reference to DMARC in the SA results
>at all, even when T_DMARC_POLICY_NONE or T_DMARC_SIMPLE_DKIM would
trigger.
but you still get KAM_DMARC_REJECT for some mail? because
KAM_DMARC_REJECT
has a workaround where it works w/o Mail::Dmarc::PurePerl
On 24.05.22 14:10, Alex wrote:
No, I haven't seen any hits since uninstalling the perl library.
I also haven't any references to DMARC whatsoever from any SA rules since
it was uninstalled.
I otherwise have no way of telling if there should have been any hits, but
I'd imagine there should have been at least one in 24-hours.
It appears to have disabled DMARC functionality entirely.
KAM.cf has some DMARC rules even without Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DMARC
available, but I'm not sure if loading that plugin doesn't disable them.
I have disabled loading it so let's see.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
