On 09.05.24 20:41, Thomas Barth wrote:
I don't understand why there are so many checks where the meaningless
value of 0.001 is assigned.
Those rules may be tested in the present.
They also may be informative, e.g. DMARC_MISSING or SPF_PASS
rules with score 0 are not used so using 0 is not possible in these cases.
Those rules may have different scores with diffent rulesets
(bayes/non-bayes, network/non-netwotk)
And they can be used in metas, e.g:
score HTML_MESSAGE 0.001
meta OBFUSCATING_COMMENT ((__OBFUSCATING_COMMENT_A && HTML_MESSAGE) ||
(__OBFUSCATING_COMMENT_B && MIME_HTML_ONLY)) && !__ISO_2022_JP_DELIM
score OBFUSCATING_COMMENT 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.723
The total score could be much higher. Do I
have to define all the checks myself with a desired value?
you can redefine values if you think, but you should be careful about it.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.999 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[DMARC_MISSING=0.001, FSL_BULK_SIG=0.001,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PYZOR_CHECK=1.985, RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD=2,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_EPI=0.01]
or
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.281 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[DMARC_MISSING=0.001, FSL_BULK_SIG=0.001,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
MIXED_HREF_CASE=1.999, PYZOR_CHECK=1.985, RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD=2,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_EPI=0.01]
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
