On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:42:58PM -0500, pgnd wrote: > , sneaking past my SA protections. Whether to call it snowshoe, I dunno :-/ > But my usually well fed Bayes isn't getting noticeably better with 'em. > https://gist.github.com/pgnd/5ab934d921939f4c62a4c978a30b9e6f
Are you even running bayes? Headers do not mention any BAYES_* matches (not even the undecisive BAYES_50) ? Is something shortcircuiting Bayes, or is it perhaps not running for some other reason? What does passing it through "spamassasin -D -t" says ? -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.
