Hello Bill, Thank you for taking the trouble to reply to me again and summarize your position.
I have read all your advice and understood it. The crazy thing is that we are flagged on SA when we send a single email, but not on Google ..., for example, and our emails go through perfectly. We never send mass emails as a matter of principle! Our problem lies in the massively over-rating of these 2 points: FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999 And that is really bad. I would like to see a whitelist on SA so that reputable companies can register there. As idea. Thank you for your time and the thoughts you have shared with me. Best wishes from Germany -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Bill Cole [mailto:billc...@apache.org] Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Februar 2025 16:08 An: wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn <mehlhorn@wissen.online>; SpamAssassin Users <users@spamassassin.apache.org> Betreff: Re: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL Domain On 2025-02-15 at 07:42:44 UTC-0500 (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:42:44 +0100) wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn <mehlhorn@wissen.online> is rumored to have said: > Hi Bill, > > so do you have another idea? Hi Stefan, No, I do not, aside from the implicit starting point: do not send spam. Make sure every recipient is an individual who has asked for your email and wants it, to the greatest degree possible. If you cannot do that, nothing anyone can tell you will fix your deliverability. SpamAssassin is not designed to allow "legitimate" bulk unsolicited email. Users who want that should whitelist the spammers of whom they approve and avoid showing it to SA. Relevant to avoiding having your email seen as spam by SpamAssassin, sending less spam-like email and finding a new and better domain name are the full extent of my deliverability advice. I understand that these recommendations are not easily implemented for an established organization. Also, please keep all SA discussion on-list. I am unable to provide private consultation of any sort. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Bill Cole [mailto:sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2025 22:33 > An: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our > TDL Domain > > On 2025-02-13 at 13:25:44 UTC-0500 (Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:25:44 +0100) > Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> is rumored to have said: > >> https://matrix.spfbl.net/90.186.69.50 >> >> move avay from this ip > > What *evidence* do you have for the OP using that IP to connect to > hosts other than his own mailserver? > > As far as I can see, there is no way that this could be the source of > his problem, because he's using that address to submit mail to his > mail server, not to transport it to other domains. > > The domain SPF record does not include it. You showed an > Authentication-Results header, but that was generated by the OPs own > mail server (mail.wissen.online) and it was clearly a normal > authenticated mail SUBMISSION, for which no sanely-run system would > reject his mail. SA would not look at that handoff in any way and > neither should any spam filter. > > >> fun part is that abusic whitelist pbl ips, just in case it helps >> >> stop fokus on tld, the important is pbl listed ip > > NO. You are focused on an irrelevancy. > > > > -- > Bill Cole > b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > (AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com > addresses) > Not Currently Available For Hire -- Bill Cole
