Hello sir!

Yes … mostly outbound, some mix of inbound & outbound depending on the
business use case. I have the M3AAWG Sender Best Common Practices in my
pocket too. Happy to discuss more offline.

Thanks! Udeme


On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 6:08 PM Tom Bartel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Udeme,
>
> So att-mail.com is valid apex domain... as in serviceable for email users
> inbound/outbound etc?  Corporate users?  Consumers?  Staff?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tom
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 11:06 AM Udeme Ukutt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I replied to Bill directly and I’m taking a look at this, but I serve
>> within our Chief Security Office. I drive policy, infrastructure and
>> cybersecurity items here.
>>
>> For closure I’ve picked this one up and looking into it. att-mail.com is
>> a valid apex domain, and I’m tightening some enforcement items any day now.
>>
>> Feel free to reach out directly for anything email related at AT&T.
>>
>> -Udeme
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 5:36 PM Bill Cole <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> AT&T made the mistake of spamming a pitch for the next iPhone via Oracle
>>> infra to my primary work address, which has never been given to any
>>> vendor or other corporate entity other than our customers. Prima facie
>>> evidence that they don't belong on the default welcomelist.
>>>
>>> If you receive email from any *@*.att-mail.com addresses that you've
>>> been accepting because of the default welcomelist, you'll need to make
>>> your own choice about whether to welcome them in the future.
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Bill Cole
>>>   [email protected] or [email protected]
>>>   (AKA @[email protected] and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
>>> addresses)
>>>   Please keep discussion mailing list replies *on-list*
>>>   Not Currently Available For Hire
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Tom Bartel
> tombartel.com
> 303.517.9655
> "Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for
> others?'" - Martin Luther King Jr.
>

Reply via email to