On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 10:49 -0500, Michael Parker wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Mike Grice wrote: > > > > Nope, but think of how it would scale. The design above is bad because > > there is no unique data in there, so the table will get slow. A better > > design would be this: > > > > Howdy, > > SpamAssassin is an open source project that welcomes contributions > from the community. If you see a particular itch that you would like > to scratch I highly encourage you to scratch it. Once you've got some > working code feel free to post it here or on the wiki to get feedback > from folks. If it's a widespread and useful feature then it may > eventually make it's way into the source base.
See that's my problem right there, I can't code for toffee, so my wishlists are just there to suggest things that I know would be good based on the things I've implemented before. Once I am up to speed I will give back, I'm not frightened of that but I'm a way off yet :) > This is exactly how I got my start working with SpamAssassin, I wanted > to be able to store the bayes and AWL data in SQL. I spent many many > months working and perfecting the code and now it's in widespread use > by many SpamAssassin users. Yup, that's the best thing about projects being open! Cheers Mike -- | Mike Grice Broadband Solutions for | Systems Engineer Home & Business @ | PlusNet plc. www.plus.net + ----- PlusNet - The smarter way to broadband ------
