On Friday May 6 2005 12:45 pm, Stewart, John wrote: > > >Although not the ideal solution, it will suffice, I suppose. > > > > I wouldn't > > > > >think at this point (assuming they make this change) that it warrants > > >submission to any RBLs. > > > > I do. I think that if they don't offer an opt out then it > > becomes unsolicited. > > The opt-out was to email back to the address and ask to be removed. The > problem was that no one was regularly checking this address. > > I spoke to the co-owner again about this and it sounds like they are > putting in a procedure to check this account regularly. > > johnS
Good on ya for taking the time and patience to educate those folks. One spammer down, hundreds to go. Dimitri
