>...
>
>Ok, right on! I fixed the trusted_networks thing, and check this out!
>
>BTW, the jerks are using another domain.. for a new "division." my god, 
>CAN-SPAM is a piece of crap. How the *hell* did it get passed? Ugh.
>
>At least it's getting plonked now. And with that, off to KFC I go...
>
>
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from mailgate.pbp.net (mailgate.pbp.net [192.168.10.87])
>       by mail.pbp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFDFA1707
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  6 May 2005 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by mailgate.pbp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158B94BFEA
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  6 May 2005 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from mailgate.pbp.net ([127.0.0.1])
>  by localhost (mailgate [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
>  id 24326-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  6 May 2005 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from outmail-34.bluetopscout.com (outmail-34.bluetopscout.com 
>[209.104.210.34])
>       by mailgate.pbp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC4646354
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  6 May 2005 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Accept-Language: en
>X-Priority: Normal
>From: HealthCare Professions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: *SPAM* Don't put it off any longer; get your degree now
>Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:18:07 EST
>Message-ID: <q7dh3,[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mailer: 3.2.2-23 [Dec 14 2004, 19:36:15]
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"; 
>class-id=3:0vebozYkN9MxMUecr:6163081
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailgate.pbp.net
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.937 tagged_above=-999 required=6
>  tests=DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, EVILNUMBER_A_BOX_1, EXCUSE_6, 
>HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,
>  HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
>  RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_SBL, URIBL_SBL
>X-Spam-Level: *************
>X-Spam-Flag: YES
>

        Now that you've posted headers and a domain name, I have some info
for the list in general (you've already gotten some off-list).

        While both can be slow, both Aplus and Names4Ever will accept and
eventually (if there are enough complaints) act against spammers.  Copies
of your "spam" and complaints *should* be forwarded to them (it wouldn't
hurt to note that bluetopscout. com has made it onto all of the SpamCop,
SBL, AHBL, and [jp] SURBL lists and that that particular mailing was in
such volume as to trigger Razor also).

        Paul Shupak
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to