On 5/6/05, List Mail User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, there is an unfortunate exception provided by Sec 3.17 > which allows "Transactional or relationship message-" and in particular > clause A.iii.I specifically allows "notification concerning a change in > the terms or features of". This has specifically been taken by courts to > allow the sending of email notifying you of a change in price(s)
Eh? When? Where? Case reference, please. > > "(iii) a valid physical postal address of the sender." > > [...] It is unfortunate that both P.O. Boxes > and "Agents for service" of a holding company would clearly qualify under > this clause (i.e. a "physical postal address" != ""physical address"). I've actually spoken to an attorney specifically about this point, and it was his contention that this was not at all clear.
