>-----Original Message----- >From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:39 PM >To: Chris Santerre >Cc: 'Stuart Gall'; users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: Custom Rule question > > >Chris Santerre wrote: > >>Eval solution: Count hits, yes. Change score based on hits, no. >> >> >Chris, using an eval solution you could do ranges, much like >bayes does. >It would be computationally efficient if done the way bayes does it too >(storing the result on the first call, and only checking value on each >subsequent one). > >However, this is in the "very advanced" realm.
Correct. But I believe JM of Theo explained that by the very nature of Perl, it couldn't return a value for a score. So the eval would only have one score. The closet one could come would be Evals of Minimums. Where by if the eval found at least X amount of Y, then return True. This kind of eval would easily be gamed by a spammer. I wanted to see some sort of new ruletype that would allow you to not only pass Y, but also X to the eval. Something like: evalmin booty /booty/i count booty 4 describe booty Too much booty found in spam! Big Booty! score booty 10.0 --Chris
