Bob, On Tue, 17 May 2005, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello John, > > Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:02:16 PM, you wrote: > > J> Hi, > J> I have been searching around with no luck. I have been playing with > J> mass-checks on my corpus using some the SARE rules sets and wanted to do a > J> sanity check against someone else's mass checks. The particular rules sets > J> are ... > > J> I see that 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf has some checks with the file. Is > J> there a place where such data is stored for these rules or is it just pot > J> luck if someone happened to do a mass-check on particular set? > > Unfortunately, mostly pot luck. A year ago we tried to update > mass-checks as we published rule sets, but never quite got the habit > developed. I don't think any of the published mass-checks have been > updated in 9 months or more. > > However, in the rule sets I maintain, > 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf > 70_sare_header0.cf > 70_sare_html0.cf > 70_sare_html1.cf > 70_sare_obfu0.cf > 70_sare_obfu1.cf > 70_sare_specific.cf > you'll find the mass-check results of each rule documented in a > #counts line immediately following each rule. > Thanks for this info. It is a help. John
