* Robert Menschel wrote (05/20/05 15:13): > Hello Chris, John, > > Friday, May 20, 2005, 3:47:55 AM, you wrote: > >>>> I can re-score these rules (or remove sare_header0, which will lower the >>>> scores anyway), but I have 2 questions: >>>> - Is this a slightly unfair double-scoring? >>>> - Are there any other similar rules I should worry about, given that >>>> some Russian mail to this server is ham? >>> >>> These are actually in the header1 file, not header0, but surely they >>> ought to be moved to the 70_sare_header_eng.cf as they hit non-English >>> ham. Bob? > > CL> They're in my header0.cf from sare/rules du jour. And in header.cf with > CL> a lower score as well. Have I got the wrong files? > > Yes, your header0 is old. Both rules are in header1 in the current > versions. You need to fix your RDJ for header0, or just delete it, > since header0 through header3 are included in header.cf > > Yes, you can and maybe should provide a lower score, at least > temporarily. > > Yes, they should be moved to header_eng, and will be this weekend.
Thanks for all this. I've been educated. > > Meanwhile, is it possible for you to send me some samples of the ham? > If I add that to my corpus, it'll be taken into account in the next > rescoring. Sent under separate cover. -- Chris
