Roman, Sorry about any implication that you or keystreams wasn't clean. I must have just glazed over your post and responded to Jeff's, saying that, indeed, you seemed "clean". Jeff's own later message (I read it after responding), pointed out exactly as you said, that keystreams was the "victim", not a "perpetrator". Sorry; I just immediately jump to "check mode" for some posts, and you looked immediately clean - and I meant to respond in that way, but not offend anyone who might have said differently. Obviously, I chose the wrong side to try not to upset. Again, I apologize for any implied offense - none was intended. (When I mean to say bad things, I think that the archives will show I do not often "mince" my words.) I only meant to point out I didn't do a "thorough" check because none seemed to be necessary (i.e. keystreams immediately looked to be an upright and legitimate company). Sincerely, Paul Shupak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No worries. It happens. -- Roman Volf Keystreams Internet Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
