On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Niek wrote:
> On 6/7/2005 5:39 PM +0200, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >URIBL has not officially requested to be included yet. We are doing some
> >behind the scenes beef ups. Our front end seems to be ever improving. :) 
> 
> I know, but that doesn't matter in this case.
> The ip listed in multi.surbl.org too, but SA seems to be checking
> spamhaus only.

The debug output specified what happened.  The domains were all in the
skip list, and SURBL and such doesn't have IPs looked up.  SBL does do
IPs, so it was queried.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"And just what is "UNIX' single point of failure," anyway?" Should we infer
 then that Windows is better because it offers multiple points of failure?"
                                 - David Wollmann from Linux Today

Attachment: pgpcHPviSQ4fy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to