>Kern, Tom wrote:
>> Well, here's one that just got thru.
>> if your SA doesn't block it, here it is-
>>
>http://lpjth.bqe4xctm83tjxcb.bullionismia.com
>
>That one hit the following in my SA 2.64 with all the surbl.org and uribl.com
>lists added:
>
>AB_URI_RBL
>BLACK_URI_RBL
>JP_URI_RBL
>
>But it did not hit SC, WS, or OB.
>
>But again, Time HAS passed since you got it. My check has no bearing whatsoever
>on what happened when it first got to your network. By the time you get my
>reply, with this URL in it, it should hit the above lists in your config (if
>you
>have them, not all are in a default setup)
>
>Black is hosted at uribl.com instead of surbl.org and certainly isn't a
>default,
>it's rather new and still in it's infancy,, you have to hand add the config for
>that one.
>
>If you send me the same URL an hour from now, the hits could change. You can
>post examples all you want, but the fact of the matter is:
>
>None of the URIBLs is psychic. None can list a domain faster than it can be
>reported to them. This means that some spam will arrive and not match the test.
>Time of check is a factor when you talk about URIBLs. It's a MAJOR factor.
>
Wow, hard to find. Registered taoday at annulet.com using name
servers for the suspended domain of aicstrungcb. biz. Already been
updated to use positionxloc. biz for name service (a domain registered
almost 5 months ago, but never used).
Of course, fraudulent registeration of all domains involved.
multitrade group / omnicorporation
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
