i installed new version completely...overiding the latest version.

On 7/1/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per last message - did you just upgrade from a very old spamassassin
> or did someone cleverly overwrite your /usr/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> file with something spurious?
> 
> The three items that failed to parse are not valid in 3.0.4. And there
> is a score defined for a rule that does not or no longer exists.
> 
> The upgrade notes might help you. They are on the WIKI site.
> 
> {^_^}
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "liyas_m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> > running spamassassin --lint gives me these
> >
> > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1
> > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: detailed_phrase_score
> 1
> > config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: spam_level_stars 1
> > warning: score set for non-existent rule MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE
> > lint: 4 issues detected.  please rerun with debug enabled for more
> information.
> >
> >
> > On 6/30/05, Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > liyas_m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/30/2005 12:02:15 AM:
> > >
> > >  > :0fw
> > >  > | /usr/bin/spamc
> > >  > No i dont see any X_Spam_headers
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > > Please respond to the list so others can assist.
> > >
> > > I don't use procmail, so I can't help you there. I assume you have spamd
> > > running?  Run  spamassassin --lint  does it produce any errors?
> > >
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  > On 6/29/05, Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  > >
> > >  > > liyas_m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/29/2005 09:19:50 AM:
> > >  > >
> > >  > >  > I just installed SpamAssassin,  but it does not catcht any
> spam..
> > >  > >  > Does SA need to be trained? If it does, how do u do that?
> > >  > >
> > >  > > How are you invoking SA?  Are you seeing any X_Spam_ headers in any
> of
> > > your
> > >  > > messages?
> > >  > > More info is required to help you.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Andy
> > >
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to