jdow wrote:
From: "jj-ml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

second pb: in some of them, there is a big attachment (> 500k) so it

doesn't

go throw spamassassin. How to resolv that pb?


That raises an interesting point. The spamc/spamd behavior should
change for the "SKIP SPAMC" tag. Instead of merely logging that it
skipped it should go off and at least run the header RBL tests while
skipping all the body tests.

I like this idea. instead of skiiping a message when its size is > $LIMIT, why not scan up to $LIMIT? there are certainly things to get fixed, but that would be a good approach. otherwise, a spammer would just add enough blanks (or whatever) to avoid filtering.

Reply via email to