> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:15 PM > To: jdow > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > jdow writes: > > From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Do you mean this script? > > > > > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt > > > > > > Note: It may be named the same as sa-stats.pl, but it is > different. Per > > > rule based. > > > > > > Another Dallas miracle! > > > > Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham or spam? > It "looks like" > > it is rather random based on the reports. BAYES_99 may well > hit on 84.33% > > of spam. But I doubt, given it's score, it hits on 44.53% of ham. > > BTW, it might be quite helpful to rename that script, since there's > already an "sa-stats.pl" in the 'tools' dir -- as follows: > > NAME > sa-stats.pl - Builds received spam/ham report from mail log >
Yeah, we know. It was originaly only used internaly by SARE. But why not share the love :) I'll see about renaming it. sare-stats.pl ? --Chris
