Herb Martin wrote: >> When people ask why I haven't upgraded from 2.64 yet... I'm waiting >> until a week goes by without a new thread about runaway / way-slow / >> resource-eating SA 3.0.X processes! :-) >> > > I suspect your wait is over 3.10 (due any day now) + 1 week > should make you happy. > > Improved thread handling and for me it works even in pre-Release.
That's great news. I'll give it a try after the initial shakedown. I must add, however, that SA 2.64 with "Spamcop URI" (SURBL), Bayes, DCC and a dash of SARE has been doing a great job here, 98% - 99% of spam caught with minimal FP's. Together with MailScanner and a virus scanner it's handling 15,000 emails per day on an old 800MHz PIII box, with the load average usually in the 0.30 range. And it's rock-solid; I've never needed to kill an SA process in over a year of uptime. Pierre
