> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Further to this, watching the mail.log, see this at the same > time as the cannot pass output in exim_main.log; > > Aug 8 15:33:17 (namehere) spamd[335]: bad protocol: header error: > (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 151152 bytes, got 151161 bytes) > > So in fact is this the problem and not a zip file error?
I don't have context for the lines above -- are these your lines? (from which log?) (I don't have "spamd[335]" nor "even spamd.335" in any of my Exim, SysLog (messages), nor SpamD logs. (I am only replying because your message quotes me below...) > On 04/08/2005, at 3:46 PM, Herb Martin wrote: > > (I was not watching this closely until late last night, and > the only > > reason I posted without firm evidence was in response to > someone else > > suffering similar symptoms.) FYI: I still get a few (maybe a dozen now) "all spamd servers failed" in my Exim panic log which uses the Unix socket. BTW, I am using the Unix socket because my impression was that it gave fewer erros than the IP socket did. BTW: I have Greylistd and SPFD both working with Unix sockets, and do not see ANY such errors from those other two programs -- at this point both are testing more emails than spamd since they run in front of spamd, and so protect it from the most egregious connections. (i.e., we don't even take the mail if Greylistd fires "grey",so SpamD and SA never see those.) SPF and Greylist daemons see 5-10 times more mail than Spamd now. -- Herb Martin
