On Aug 24, 2005, at 8:04 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That sounds odd, doesn't it? "dynamic trusted_networks". The whole
point of a trusted network is that it's a specific network. However,
if a message came from a client who gave SMTP-AUTH, it ought to be
"trusted" (and not subjected to the blacklist checks). And that's
what my feature request boils down to:
Would you care to expound on your theory here. What makes you think
a valid SPF is a sign of a good guy?
What makes you think SPF was in any way related to my message?
Perhaps some RTFMing is needed on your part.
