-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
John Rudd writes: > On Sep 8, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > On 9/7/05, Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> has this been opened as a bug in BZ yet? > >> > >> I haven't seen a sign of it. I hope the OP does this, I'd hate to > >> have to > >> try to track back through 3 weeks of deleted mail to find the original > >> posting. Especially since I don't remember who posted it! > > > > John Rudd, on August 27. Took me about 15 seconds to find it in gmail > > (well, really, to find the message John sent on August 29 in which he > > quoted the August 27 mail). The subject was "Problems with > > SpamAssassin 3.1 RC1and MIMEDefang". > > > > It looks like Loren did find it and enter it: > > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4573 > > (and, I'm sorry I'm not the one who entered it; I'm not the one who > actually has been having the problem, I was just trying to get it on > the SA developers radar after it popped up on the mimedefang mailing > list ... so I was leery of starting the next step when I wouldn't be > able to give actual technical details) Fair enough. That indeed is why I was wary of opening it myself; without someone close to the original reporter, what often winds up happening is that we speculate uselessly, and occasionally receive forwarded comments that have been filtered via "chinese whispers". it can be messy. (I think in this case we've gotten away with it safely, though, as I see David is now commenting on the bug.) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDIKEvMJF5cimLx9ARAqs2AJ4qxluWU6clarTvrPK57LWGG6YJqwCfa8ki 3zhLXgKnFHUjfn3Q0FfLP5A= =WpCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
