[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I had a client receive an email which was marked as a spam email. The > big hit on this was from the TO_MALFORMED. This seems to be a away > that some of these vendors/lists send out messages. I can add them to > a whitelist, but I thought I would just see if there is something > better than that I can do (sorry don't use bayes here)
> To: Newsletter Subscribers, > Newsletter list Short of convincing the senders to fix their To: field, there's not much you can do to actually fix the problem. As workarounds, you can whitelist the senders or drop the score for TO_MALFORMED, or (if you're more ambitious) some meta rules and subrules to reduce the score for this sender hitting TO_MALFORMED. Given the real problem, however, I'd guess that you may occasionally see other problems with this/these sender(s). (For instance, you can't use whitelist_to with them, which is one "proper" way to whitelist a mailing list.) > * 2.3 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address Wow. That's a big change from 2.64: score TO_MALFORMED 0.345 0.274 0.907 0.640 -kgd -- Get your mouse off of there! You don't know where that email has been!
