Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 13. September 2005 14:06 Steve [Spamassasin] wrote:
>
BTW: is pyzor good / worth the effort? It's latest release is September
7, 2002, for that I thought it wouldn't be used too much anymore. Do
you get enough hits?
On my system, pyzor gets about half as many hits as DCC but is still one
of the more productive rules, coming in just after the SURBLs. However,
its default score is fairly high and it has a tendancy to FP on certain
types of messages so you have to be careful.
Here is a meta rule I was working on to reduce pyzor FPs:
meta L_pyzor_fp (PYZOR_CHECK && (MIME_HTML_ONLY || MIME_HTML_MOSTLY) &&
!DIGEST_MULTIPLE)
score L_pyzor_fp -2
