Jona The JP test was included in 3.0.4 so you can take that out...
Looking in /usr/local/share/spamassassin/25_uribl.cf the black and grey URI-RBLs are in their by default you so you'll need those. For the other tests, check in /usr/local/share/spamassassin and see for youself. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 -----Original Message----- From: Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 September 2005 12:53 To: [email protected] Subject: SA 3.1 tests Hi all, Just installed 3.1 (upgrade from 3.0.4). I have this in my local.cf file: ---------------------------------------------> score URIBL_SC_SURBL 5.0 score URIBL_SBL 6.0 score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 5.0 urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A 2 body URIBL_BLACK eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK') describe URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist tflags URIBL_BLACK net score URIBL_BLACK 3.0 urirhssub URIBL_GREY multi.uribl.com. A 4 body URIBL_GREY eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_GREY') describe URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist tflags URIBL_GREY net score URIBL_GREY 1.0 urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 64 body URIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_JP_SURBL') describe URIBL_JP_SURBL Has URI in SURBL/JP tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL net score URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.0 <--------------------------------------------- Are the entries urirhssub still neccesary in SA 3.1 ? It seems 3.1 added some extra SURBL tests? http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html Thnx. J. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. **********************************************************************
