--- email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But again, since almost no legitimate email is ever > > greylisted only almost nothing DESIRABLE EVER gets > > delayed. > > So you ONLY greylist what the RBLs tell you is on their list? Maybe I need > to go back and re-read your original email, which I skimmed perhaps too > lightly... because even back in the day before we used greylisting (we use > "straight"), and only had something like four RBLs rejecting mail outright, > we still saw a lot of spam getting through (for SA to score). So I just > can't imagine that selective greylisting of whatever is on the RBLs will > catch nearly as much as you'd want it to. What are your other mechanisms > for > tempfailing beside RBL? Sorry, your subsequent emails answered this -- SA seems to be the other tool that pushes a message into the greylist zone. With these two (two right? not any more?) tools driving your greylisting, I'm curious how many (suspicious) mails make it to your spam buckets (or even to your inbox)? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com