Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > Hi! > > You could try: > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_specific.cf
1) I do use that ruleset, it helps a little, but not that much. > > Caches a lot of the ph*rm spams out there. 2) ph*rm spams aren't the problem. It's porn, not pills we are talking about here. 3) sare's adult ruleset targets porn spam and helps too. 4) URIBL has been working great, but a lot of the "first wave" goes undetected by it. I've been combining all of the above with the posted ruleset and bayes. With all of them together I've gotten fairly good results for picking up Leo's latest variants of porn spam. However, just 1-4 combined with bayes have been rather lackluster at detecting them, with a less than 50% hit rate here at my network. Of course, later re-exams uribl always hits, but it seems to miss a good number of them when they come in.
