> >>Whitelist appears to be a newer file regardless of what the headers
> >>say. It includes more sites in its whitelist. It appears whitelist_rcvd
> >>is obsolete. It's not mentioned on the SARE Rules page.
> >
> > These were announced on the list about a week ago.
Whitelist_from_rcvd.cf
> > is NEW file.
>
> Great. Shouldn't the old one be removed?
No. Whitelist_from_rcvd is 3.10 ONLY. It tightens up some of the whitelist
rules by using syntax (or maybe a plugin, I forget) that is only avaiable in
3.1. As best I recall, mist of the normal whitelist is still applicable to
3.1 systems, and is the only one useable on 3.0.x and previous.
Loren
