jdow wrote:
From: "Chris L. Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Back in 2.64 There was the option to have SA stop going though rules
then it hit a max score.
Is there any option for this in 3.X.X ?
No. Such a rule actually costs processing time AND would create false
positives or false negatives entirely too easily.
{^_^}
It's not costly, Heck even it was able to stopped 1/4 of all messages
from going though 3/4 of all your rules. You'd Still be saving in cpu
time !!!
And your "create false positives or false negatives entirely too easily"
, please it changes nothing. You just as likey now to mis mark a message
as you would if you stopped scanning email from being scanned if it
reached a Spam score of X.
I mean spam rules 101. Using ham'in rules is nothing but waste of time.
If you need to write ham rules you really need to rethink your spam rules.
--
-- Chris L. Franklin --
--
