Matt Kettler wrote: > mouss wrote: > >>Matt Kettler a écrit : >> >> >>>mouss wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for >>>>any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP. >>>> >>> >>> >>>Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. >> >>You may have missed the "/?" part. I don't score any geocities link >>unless it has a "/?" pattern. for me, this is very rare (the only legit >>example I have in mind now is the courier-imap site, which really >>doesn't need that) in general. so, in short: I have never seen a legit >>geocities url that uses a "/?" script. This is not an easy construct for >>beginners (most people don't even know this is feasible), and advanced >>people don't need it. > > > Ahh, I did miss that.. > > So the regex looks something like this: > > /\.geocities\.com\/\.*\/\?/i >
Side note: nearly all my recent geocities-link spams have not used a /? script. I am still seeing some, but most of my recent ones are in the /xyz123/ format: Here's my most recent ones, only one of which had a /? in it: http://uk.geocities.com/aaqwn54/ http://uk.geocities.com/aaqwno13/ http://uk.geocities.com/Pyotr76560Ernaline5835/?64378274347 http://uk.geocities.com/zzqwno29/ http://uk.geocities.com/zzqwno31/ http://uk.geocities.com/zqwn26/ http://uk.geocities.com/zqwn35/ http://de.geocities.com/Ilka23447Harli65881/ http://uk.geocities.com/zqwnasqw54/ http://uk.geocities.com/zqnasqw12/ http://uk.geocities.com/zqnasqw96/
